Until the past several decades, psychotherapists believed they were a blank canvas onto which their patients projected all their unresolved issues from their childhood and their internal relational experiences with their parents. Nowadays, we believe that there is a close, real relationship between the patient and therapist that develops over time and may become the most important agent for change in the patient’s treatment. Both the patient and therapist bring to the relationship their own unconscious past relational patterns that originated in early childhood experiences, often between them and their parents.

It is crucial that the therapist monitor the nuanced interactions and enactments that occur over the course of the therapy. The danger in not paying close attention to the shifts between them and their patients could lead to serious negative consequences, such as repeating unhealthy relational patterns or driving the patient out of treatment. I recently encountered one example of such an enactment in my practice. Twice I mistakenly got the time wrong for one patient and I either had booked someone else during his time slot or I forgot to come to my office to see him. If I wasn’t monitoring the shifts in our relationship, I may have dismissed this as a simple error on my part instead of an interaction between us, and it could have well marked the end of his therapy. Luckily I was aware of how unusual this behavior was, as I have never mistaken a patient’s time slot in my 20 years of practice. This signaled to me that there must be an enactment between us that tells us something essential about the patient’s relational experience in the world. Sure enough, after exploring this together, we discovered his experience of feeling like an afterthought to his parents and friends most of his life. Instead of driving him away from treatment, this enactment elucidated something important about this patient’s relational dynamics and became an essential part of his healing.

I sometimes think that if a patient and I focus on nothing else but the twists and turns in our relationship, we still might be engaged in the vital process of therapeutic action that enables the patient to make long-lasting positive changes to his or her life. This relationship is unique in that I am a part of it, unlike all other relationships that I only hear about through the lens of their point of view. I can help patients come to understand deep-rooted relational patterns and have a positive experience of a relationship that might be unlike any other past or current relationships they have ever experienced. Such a healthy relationship can be a “corrective emotional experience” that can have everlasting changes for the patient.

Although attachment theory has its origins in the research of infant development and is not a model for how to conduct psychotherapy, I have found it increasingly useful as a therapist to consider attachment style when sitting with a patient. In a healthy development children develop a secure attachment with their primary caretaker, usually the mother. More often than not an insecure attachment develops. John Bowlby outlines three types of insecure attachments. An avoidant attachment style is one in which the child adopts the attitude that he/she is fine without the caretaker and maintains this “I don’t need you” stance throughout life. An individual with an ambivalent attachment style responds to an unpredictable parent by either becoming angry or exhibiting helplessness. And an individual with a disorganized attachment style can present as scattered and disoriented, especially when the attachment figure is unavailable.

These attachment styles originate in infancy and persist through adolescence and adulthood. We find that these are transmuted generationally, with children often mirroring the attachment style of their caretaker. It is imperative for a clinician to be aware of one’s own attachment style as well as to attend to one’s patient’s unique attachment style, as these will emerge in the treatment as the relationship between the therapist and patient evolves. It may well inform the clinician and patient about what is being enacted in the therapy, and if a clinician is not paying close enough attention, the danger is that things get acted out in the therapeutic relationship without being addressed.

Attachment styles are not set in stone. Through the work of therapy, someone who previously had an insecure attachment style can learn to develop healthy attachments in their closest relationships. It may not replicate the experience of one who was born with secure attachments, but it is still possible for the individual to establish and maintain close, meaningful interpersonal relationships. As a therapist who works relationally, I view the therapeutic relationship as the primary agent of change. By focusing directly on attending to what occurs in the relationship between therapist and patient, we can afford the patient the opportunity to experience a healthy attachment, possibly for the first time. The real relationship between therapist and patient offers the patient the chance to learn and practice developing true closeness with a nonjudgmental parental figure with whom one can reveal their authentic self without repercussion of rejection, abandonment, or wrath. Over time, the hope is that by modeling a healthy relationship between therapist and patient, this experience will transfer to other close relationships outside of this dyadic relationship. In this way, the bulk of therapy happens in the room by addressing the ever-changing landscape of the real relationship between therapist and patient. The therapeutic relationship thus presents a unique opportunity for emotional intimacy that may endure as one of the closest and healthiest relationships the patient has known.

Blog